AI Summary of Peer-Reviewed Research
This page presents an AI-generated summary of a published research paper. The original authors did not write or review this article. See full disclosure ↓
Publication Signals show what we were able to verify about where this research was published.MODERATECore publication signals for this source were verified. Publication Signals reflect the source’s verifiable credentials, not the quality of the research.
- ✔ Peer-reviewed source
- ✔ No retraction or integrity flags
Overview
This study documents the pedagogical outcomes of a graduate-level course in grant and proposal writing at Sam Houston State University, examining how community-engaged, social justice-oriented instruction shapes the development of practitioner-scholars in technical and professional communication. The research centers on a structured assignment requiring students to develop unsolicited proposals addressing local organizational or community needs, grounding the exercise in authentic contextual constraints and ethical frameworks.
Methods and approach
Five graduate students participated in a semi-simulated assignment, the Better Sam Program project, which required development of full proposals addressing documented issues or opportunities within Sam Houston State University or the Huntsville community. The assignment was framed within community-engaged and social justice orientations to ensure proposals reflected genuine community needs rather than simulated or generic scenarios. Data collection employed structured reflective questioning to encourage critical analysis of students' proposal development experiences, methodological choices, and consideration of broader implications for community advocacy and social responsibility.
Key Findings
Student reflections revealed that the community-engaged assignment fostered critical analytical capacity regarding the intersection of technical writing competencies and ethical stakeholder engagement. Proposals generated through the assignment demonstrated contextual grounding in local organizational dynamics and community-identified priorities. The reflective process enabled students to articulate connections between proposal development practices and broader frameworks of social responsibility, ethical research conduct, and community advocacy positioning.
Implications
The findings suggest that integrating community-engagement and social justice frameworks into grant writing pedagogy produces measurable shifts in how emerging scholars conceptualize the ethical dimensions of proposal development. Rather than treating grant writing as a discrete technical skill, the community-oriented approach positions it as an integrative practice encompassing stakeholder analysis, research integrity, and accountability to non-academic constituencies. This pedagogical model may inform curriculum design in technical and professional communication programs seeking to develop practitioners capable of navigating institutional and community contexts simultaneously.
Disclosure
- Research title: Practicing Grant and Proposal Writing with a Community-Engaged Approach: Reflections of Emerging Technical Communication Scholars
- Authors: Shyam B. Pandey, Robin Pate, Michele Herbert, Aresia Arthurs, Anna Woolley, Tameca Jenkins
- Institutions: Towson University, Sam Houston State University, The University of Texas at Arlington, Lone Star College
- Publication date: 2026-02-24
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.59236/rjv25i1pp45-103
- OpenAlex record: View
- PDF: Download
- Image credit: Photo by Vitaly Gariev on Unsplash (Source • License)
- Disclosure: This post was generated by Claude (Anthropic). The original authors did not write or review this post.
Get the weekly research newsletter
Stay current with peer-reviewed research without reading academic papers — one filtered digest, every Friday.


