AI Summary of Peer-Reviewed Research

This page presents an AI-generated summary of a published research paper. The original authors did not write or review this article. [See full disclosure ↓]

Publishing process signals: MODERATE — reflects the venue and review process. — venue and review process.

Common QuickMarks improved feedback consistency

A woman wearing a dark blue shirt sits at a white desk with a laptop computer on the right, a desk lamp on the left, and papers in front of her, appearing to write or annotate documents while reviewing her work.
Photo by ThisisEngineering on Unsplash · Unsplash License
Research area:Social SciencesEducationStudent Assessment and Feedback

What the study found

Common QuickMarks (reusable feedback comments in Turnitin) developed with the ImPACT principles were reported to improve feedback consistency, transparency, and acceptability. The study also found that students needed support to act on the feedback.

Why the authors say this matters

The authors say the approach matters because it can help improve the transparency of assessment, support teaching staff's feedback literacy, and support students' feedback literacy. They also suggest it may help address lack of transparency in feedback while allowing some personalisation.

What the researchers tested

The project was carried out in two phases across two institutions, both involving psychology teaching staff. Staff were asked to provide all or their most important QuickMarks, content analyses were used to identify feedback topics, and these were used to develop QuickMark sets based on the ImPACT principles: Improvement focus, Parsimony/Generality, Accessibility, Clarity and Consistency, and Tone.

What worked and what didn't

In phase 1, teaching staff reported that using common QuickMarks made marking more efficient and encouraged a balance between positive and developmental feedback. In phase 2, the same method was used to develop common QuickMarks aligned with course learning outcomes at another university, and student feedback was mainly positive; however, students still needed support to act on the feedback.

What to keep in mind

The abstract does not describe detailed limitations beyond noting that encouraging staff to adhere to the common set of QuickMarks is still needed. The findings are based on psychology teaching staff and students in two institutions, so the summary is limited to that context.

Key points

  • The study developed ImPACT principles for what counts as good feedback.
  • Common QuickMarks were reported to improve consistency, transparency, and acceptability of feedback.
  • Teaching staff said common QuickMarks made marking more efficient in phase 1.
  • Student feedback was mainly positive, but students still needed help to act on the feedback.
  • The authors say staff adherence to the common QuickMark set still needs encouragement.

Disclosure

Research title:
Common QuickMarks improved feedback consistency
Publication date:
2026-01-28
OpenAlex record:
View
Image credit:
Photo by ThisisEngineering on Unsplash · Unsplash License
AI provenance: AI provenance information is not available for this post.