AI Summary of Peer-Reviewed Research

This page presents an AI-generated summary of a published research paper. The original authors did not write or review this article. [See full disclosure ↓]

Publishing process signals: STRONG — reflects the venue and review process. — venue and review process.

AI changes assessment practices in management education

A man in a white shirt and glasses leans over to assist an older woman wearing glasses as she works on a laptop computer in a modern, bright classroom or office setting with large windows in the background.
Research area:Social SciencesEducationStudent Assessment and Feedback

What the study found

AI-driven technologies are changing assessment practices in management education, especially in how assessments are designed, set, graded, evaluated, and how feedback is provided. The study found that academics showed modification and augmentation in assessment design and setting, but only substitution in grading, evaluation, and feedback.

Why the authors say this matters

The authors conclude that AI tools may have promising prospects for assessment in education, especially in developing countries with similar economic, technological, social, and cultural conditions to Sri Lanka. The study suggests that understanding the drivers of these changes, especially normative pressure, may help explain how AI is being adopted in assessment tasks.

What the researchers tested

The researchers examined the impact of AI-driven technologies, including generative AI tools, automated grading and feedback systems, plagiarism detection tools, and adaptive learning platforms, on assessment models in management education at universities. They used 15 interviews, supplemented by documents, and analyzed the material using the SAMR model, which describes technology use as substitution, augmentation, modification, and redefinition, along with three isomorphic forces in new institutional sociology.

What worked and what didn't

In assessment design and setting, the findings indicate modification and augmentation levels of AI incorporation. For grading, evaluation, and feedback, the study reports only substitution-level use. Normative pressure was identified as the primary driving force behind AI integration in assessment design, setting, and feedback provision.

What to keep in mind

The study focuses on management education in Sri Lanka, so its findings are context-specific. The abstract does not describe detailed limitations beyond that scope, though it notes the number of interviews was determined by data saturation.

Key points

  • AI-driven technologies are reshaping assessment in management education.
  • Assessment design and setting showed modification and augmentation, according to the SAMR model.
  • Grading, evaluation, and feedback showed only substitution-level AI use.
  • Normative pressure was the main driver identified for AI integration.
  • The study focused on management education in Sri Lanka and used 15 interviews plus documents.

Disclosure

Research title:
AI changes assessment practices in management education
Authors:
Amali Henadirage, B. T. K. Chathuranga, Nuwan Gunarathne
Institutions:
University of Sri Jayewardenepura
Publication date:
2026-01-26
OpenAlex record:
View
AI provenance: This post was generated by OpenAI. The original authors did not write or review this post.