Effects of Oral Exams on Entry-Level STEM Mathematics Students

Two people stand at a large chalkboard covered in mathematical equations and formulas, with one person in a black vest and jeans writing on the board while another person in a black blazer looks on.
Image Credit: Photo by Vitaly Gariev on Unsplash (SourceLicense)

About This Article

This is an AI-generated summary of a research paper. The original authors did not write or review this article. See full disclosure ↓

International journal on teaching and learning in higher education·2026-01-21·View original paper →

Overview

This study examines oral examinations as an alternative assessment modality in entry-level college algebra courses, comparing their effects on student conceptual retention and performance outcomes relative to conventional assessment methods. The investigation integrates quantitative performance metrics with qualitative analysis of student experiences and learning processes.

Methods and approach

The research employed a comparative design with two distinct groups: one cohort subjected to traditional assessment protocols and a second cohort participating in oral examination formats. Data collection encompassed both summative assessment scores and qualitative feedback mechanisms. The methodological framework prioritized triangulation of quantitative and qualitative evidence to evaluate the differential impacts of assessment modality on student learning outcomes and metacognitive engagement.

Results

Quantitative analysis of summative assessment performance revealed no statistically significant differences between the traditional assessment and oral examination groups. Qualitative data, however, demonstrated substantive differences in student experience and reported learning processes. Oral examination participants reported enhanced opportunities for immediate formative feedback, demonstrable advancement in critical thinking application, and more comprehensive evaluation of mathematical understanding spanning procedural fluency and conceptual reasoning.

Implications

Oral examinations present a structurally viable assessment alternative within mathematics education contexts, despite producing equivalent summative performance outcomes. The differential qualitative benefits suggest that assessment modality selection involves trade-offs between standardized measurement equivalence and pedagogical engagement dimensions. Institutional adoption of oral examinations may support differentiated learning experiences and deeper concept internalization without compromising performance parity.

Disclosure

  • Research title: Effects of Oral Exams on Entry-Level STEM Mathematics Students
  • Authors: Krysten Ashley Pampel
  • Publication date: 2026-01-21
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.7771/1812-9129.1048
  • OpenAlex record: View
  • Image credit: Photo by Vitaly Gariev on Unsplash (SourceLicense)
  • Disclosure: This post was generated by artificial intelligence. The original authors did not write or review this post.