What the study found
The author argues that Wittgenstein’s philosophy is naturalistic because of its anti-scientific stance, which comes from the idea that philosophy has its own autonomous practice. The paper also argues that Wittgenstein’s treatment of religion does not make room for supernaturalism, even if religious utterances are sometimes taken to have supernatural content.
Why the authors say this matters
The authors suggest that this reading of Wittgenstein could help rethink methodological naturalism in philosophy of religion. The study also suggests that the usual distinction between cognitivist and non-cognitivist approaches to religion may need reconsideration in light of Wittgenstein’s anti-scientism.
What the researchers tested
This is a conceptual argument in philosophy, focused on Wittgenstein’s views on science, religion, and philosophical method. The author examines interpretations that portray Wittgenstein as naturalistic and addresses claims that his philosophy was anti-scientistic and that his views on religion leave room for supernaturalist claims.
What worked and what didn't
The author claims that Wittgenstein’s anti-scientism supports naturalism rather than ruling it out. The paper also argues that, although Wittgenstein’s philosophy of religion may be described as cognitivist, it still does not allow supernaturalism, and that any alleged acknowledgment of supernatural content does not enter his philosophical practice.
What to keep in mind
The abstract does not provide empirical data or experimental results; it presents a philosophical interpretation. It also does not describe detailed objections, limitations, or alternative readings beyond noting that these interpretations have been debated.
Key points
- The author argues that Wittgenstein’s anti-scientism is compatible with naturalism.
- The paper says Wittgenstein’s philosophy of religion does not allow supernaturalism.
- The argument rests on the autonomy of philosophical practice.
- The study suggests the cognitivist/non-cognitivist distinction in religion may need reconsideration.
- The abstract presents a philosophical interpretation rather than empirical findings.
Disclosure
- Research title:
- Wittgenstein’s anti-scientism is argued to support naturalism
- Authors:
- Aleksei Yuryevich Rakhmanin
- Institutions:
- University of Helsinki
- Publication date:
- 2026-03-30
- OpenAlex record:
- View
Get the weekly research newsletter
Stay current with peer-reviewed research without reading academic papers — one filtered digest, every Friday.