Designing for Upstream Work: Learnings from Co-Design for Preventative Solutions with Urban Fire Departments

A person wearing a blue checkered shirt and headphones sits at a wooden desk in a busy office environment, working at a laptop with multiple computer monitors displaying data dashboards and information screens visible in the background.
Image Credit: Photo by CDC on Pexels (SourceLicense)

AI Summary of Scholarly Research

This page presents an AI-generated summary of a published research paper. The original authors did not write or review this article. See full disclosure ↓

⚠️ This article summarizes published research and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice or clinical guidance.

Publication Signals show what we were able to verify about where this research was published.MODERATECore publication signals for this source were verified. Publication Signals reflect the source’s verifiable credentials, not the quality of the research.
  • ✔ Published in indexed journal
  • ✔ No retraction or integrity flags

Key findings from this study

This research indicates that:

  • Demonstrating success to stakeholders represents a distinct and fundamental design challenge for preventative programs that differs from acute-response work.
  • Data visualization tools can make preventative program outcomes visible and meaningful across different stakeholder audiences with varying priorities.
  • Co-design processes with community organizations reveal specific data practices and communication needs essential for scaling upstream initiatives.

Overview

This research examines design approaches for preventative interventions addressing root causes rather than crisis response, focusing on co-design processes with urban fire departments developing alternate emergency medical services response programs. The work identifies demonstrating success to stakeholders as a central challenge for upstream initiatives and proposes a data dashboard prototype to make preventative program outcomes visible across different audience segments.

Methods and approach

The researchers conducted a multi-phase co-design process with fire departments implementing alternate EMS response programs aimed at reducing 911 call volume. The collaborative design approach engaged stakeholders throughout development, with particular attention to data practices and communication needs within community organizations.

Results

The co-design process generated a data dashboard prototype designed to visualize preventative program outcomes for multiple stakeholder audiences. The dashboard addresses a critical gap identified in upstream work: the difficulty of demonstrating program success to decision-makers and funders who evaluate initiatives against traditional outcome metrics. The prototype incorporates design solutions that emerged from iterative collaboration, reflecting stakeholder requirements for both evidence generation and stakeholder communication specific to prevention-focused interventions.

Implications

The research contributes to literature on supporting data practices in community organizations by articulating how design tools can facilitate stakeholder engagement with preventative work. Organizations implementing upstream initiatives require deliberate design interventions that make program impact visible and comprehensible to diverse audiences, particularly those accustomed to acute-response metrics. This work establishes foundational understanding of design practices supporting the scaling and institutionalization of preventative programs within established emergency services structures.

Scope and limitations

This summary is based on the study abstract and available metadata. It does not include a full analysis of the complete paper, supplementary materials, or underlying datasets unless explicitly stated. Findings should be interpreted in the context of the original publication.

Disclosure

  • Research title: Designing for Upstream Work: Learnings from Co-Design for Preventative Solutions with Urban Fire Departments
  • Authors: Rachel B. Warren, Ruchita Arvind Mandhre, Hiba Siraj, G. Mauricio Mejía, Myeong Lee, Yunan Chen, Kathleen H. Pine
  • Institutions: Arizona State University, George Mason University, University of California, Irvine
  • Publication date: 2026-04-13
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3791677
  • OpenAlex record: View
  • Image credit: Photo by CDC on Pexels (SourceLicense)
  • Disclosure: This post was generated by Claude (Anthropic). The original authors did not write or review this post.

Get the weekly research newsletter

Stay current with peer-reviewed research without reading academic papers — one filtered digest, every Friday.

More posts