CO2 Emissions in Structural Applications: Comparative Study of GFRP and Steel in Structural Components and Systems

Two people examining and comparing wood flooring samples and material swatches laid out on a white surface, including wood veneer panels, textile samples, and color/finish reference cards.
Image Credit: Photo by cottonbro studio on Pexels (SourceLicense)

AI Summary of Peer-Reviewed Research

This page presents an AI-generated summary of a published research paper. The original authors did not write or review this article. See full disclosure ↓

Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering·2026-02-23·Peer-reviewed·View original paper ↗·Follow this topic (RSS)
Publication Signals show what we were able to verify about where this research was published.MODERATECore publication signals for this source were verified. Publication Signals reflect the source’s verifiable credentials, not the quality of the research.
  • ✔ Peer-reviewed source
  • ✔ No retraction or integrity flags

Overview

This study presents a comparative life-cycle assessment of CO2 emissions between glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) and steel across diverse structural applications and systems. The research addresses a documented knowledge gap regarding the sustainability performance of FRP composites under practical loading conditions relative to conventional materials. The analysis employed multiple metrics including total CO2 emissions, unit service life CO2 emissions, and unit volume CO2 emissions, with sensitivity analysis to account for variability in primary input parameters.

Methods and approach

The study employed a comparative life-cycle assessment framework to evaluate CO2 emissions across GFRP and steel structural applications. Total CO2 emissions were calculated for various structural components and systems, with unit performance measures normalized by service life and material volume. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess robustness across variations in primary input data. The methodology incorporated practical loading conditions and long-term structural performance considerations to ensure relevance across diverse applications.

Key Findings

GFRP demonstrated lower total CO2 emissions than steel in the majority of structural applications examined. Unit life-cycle CO2 emission ratios revealed favorable sustainability profiles for GFRP structural components and systems when evaluated over extended service periods. Unit volume CO2 emission ratios further supported GFRP's sustainability advantage, though meaningful comparisons require consideration of material use efficiency, transportation logistics, and spatial optimization. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of GFRP's sustainability advantage across most structural applications and systems relative to steel.

Implications

The findings provide quantitative evidence supporting the adoption of GFRP in infrastructure applications from a carbon emissions perspective. Explicit GFRP-to-steel ratios for total CO2 emissions and unit performance metrics furnish data-driven guidance for engineering and design practice. The research establishes that GFRP sustainability benefits become increasingly pronounced over extended service life, suggesting particular suitability for long-duration structural applications.

Disclosure

  • Research title: CO2 Emissions in Structural Applications: Comparative Study of GFRP and Steel in Structural Components and Systems
  • Authors: Md Ala Uddin, Faysal Ahamed, Yoojung Yoon, Hota GangaRao
  • Publication date: 2026-02-23
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/jmcee7.mteng-21827
  • OpenAlex record: View
  • Image credit: Photo by cottonbro studio on Pexels (SourceLicense)
  • Disclosure: This post was generated by Claude (Anthropic). The original authors did not write or review this post.

Get the weekly research newsletter

Stay current with peer-reviewed research without reading academic papers — one filtered digest, every Friday.

More posts