AI Summary of Peer-Reviewed Research

This page presents an AI-generated summary of a published research paper. The original authors did not write or review this article. [See full disclosure ↓]

Publishing process signals: MODERATE — reflects the venue and review process. — venue and review process.

Academic expert involvement varies across policymaking arenas

A wooden conference table in a brick-walled meeting room with six gray upholstered chairs positioned around it, a metal water pitcher and glass visible on the table surface, and windows with dark frames in the background.
Research area:Social SciencesPolitical Science and International RelationsExpert opinion

What the study found

Academic expert involvement differed substantially across parliament, government, and the media in Belgium. The study found limited repeated participation and limited overlap of experts across these arenas, while senior male professors from the social sciences and humanities were consistently overrepresented relative to the academic population.

Why the authors say this matters

The authors say the study offers insight into whose voices shape evidence-informed policymaking and how arena-specific dynamics structure that participation. They also note that the findings help show how scientific expertise functions in policymaking across direct and indirect arenas.

What the researchers tested

The researchers conducted a comparative analysis of academic expert involvement in three Belgian arenas: parliament, government, and the media. They used a self-compiled dataset of 17,843 consulted actors, including 3,440 academic experts, and examined overall patterns, repeated participation, cross-arena overlap, and expert profile characteristics.

What worked and what didn't

The analysis showed substantial variation in academic expert involvement between arenas. It also found limited repeated participation and limited cross-arena overlap. Across arenas, senior male professors in the social sciences and humanities were overrepresented, and arena-specific logics such as supply and demand dynamics, gatekeeper mechanisms, and mandate structures appeared to shape involvement.

What to keep in mind

The abstract does not describe specific limitations beyond the study's focus on Belgium and the three arenas it examined. The findings are based on the dataset and comparisons described in the abstract, so the scope is limited to those settings.

Key points

  • Academic expert involvement varied substantially across parliament, government, and the media in Belgium.
  • Repeated participation of the same experts was limited, and overlap across arenas was also limited.
  • Senior male professors from the social sciences and humanities were overrepresented relative to the academic population.
  • Arena-specific logics, including supply and demand dynamics, gatekeeper mechanisms, and mandate structures, shaped involvement.

Disclosure

Research title:
Academic expert involvement varies across policymaking arenas
Authors:
Janne Ingelbeen, Tessa Haesevoets, Bram Wauters
Institutions:
University College Ghent, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, European Corporate Governance Institute
Publication date:
2026-03-19
OpenAlex record:
View
AI provenance: This post was generated by OpenAI. The original authors did not write or review this post.