AI Summary of Peer-Reviewed Research

This page presents an AI-generated summary of a published research paper. The original authors did not write or review this article. [See full disclosure ↓]

Publishing process signals: MODERATE — reflects the venue and review process. — venue and review process.

RIRS and mini-PCNL were similarly effective for high-density pediatric kidney stones

Medical staff in scrubs and masks attend to an infant patient in a hospital room, with one healthcare worker examining or caring for the child while others assist.
Research area:UrologyPediatric Urology and Nephrology StudiesKidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments

What the study found

Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), a kidney stone procedure done through the natural urinary passage, and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL), a smaller-access stone removal procedure, were both effective and safe for children with renal pelvic stones smaller than 2 cm and density above 1000 HU. RIRS had similar stone-free rates to mini-PCNL and was associated with less operative burden.

Why the authors say this matters

The authors conclude that both approaches are useful for managing these pediatric stones, and they say RIRS offers comparable efficacy with less invasiveness, shorter recovery, and lower radiation exposure. They also note that mini-PCNL remains a valuable option in anatomically complex or lower-calyceal cases.

What the researchers tested

The study was a prospective randomized clinical trial at Beni-Suef University Hospitals. It included 70 children aged 3 to 14 years with a single renal pelvic stone smaller than 2 cm and density greater than 1000 HU on low-dose non-contrast CT, randomized equally to RIRS or mini-PCNL.

What worked and what didn't

At one month, the stone-free rate was 91.4% for RIRS and 94.3% for mini-PCNL, with no significant difference. RIRS showed shorter operative time, shorter hospital stay, shorter catheterization time, and lower radiation exposure; hemoglobin drop was minimal in RIRS and greater in mini-PCNL, while complication rates were similar.

What to keep in mind

The abstract does not describe longer-term follow-up beyond one month. It also does not provide detailed limitations, so scope constraints beyond the studied age group, stone size, stone density, and hospital setting are not described in the available summary.

Key points

  • Both RIRS and mini-PCNL achieved high one-month stone-free rates in children.
  • The stone-free rates were 91.4% for RIRS and 94.3% for mini-PCNL, with no significant difference.
  • RIRS had shorter operative time, hospital stay, catheterization time, and lower radiation exposure.
  • Hemoglobin drop was minimal in RIRS and greater in mini-PCNL.
  • Complication rates were similar between the two procedures.

Disclosure

Research title:
RIRS and mini-PCNL were similarly effective for high-density pediatric kidney stones
Authors:
Ossama Mahmoud, Mahmoud Abdallah, Ahmed ElSayed Ahmed Abdellatif, Ahmed Hamdy Mostafa, Anas Albudairat, Akram A. Elmarakbi, Hany F. Badawy
Institutions:
Beni-Suef University, Inova Alexandria Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation
Publication date:
2026-02-03
OpenAlex record:
View
AI provenance: This post was generated by OpenAI. The original authors did not write or review this post.