AI Summary of Peer-Reviewed Research

This page presents an AI-generated summary of a published research paper. The original authors did not write or review this article. [See full disclosure ↓]

Publishing process signals: MODERATE — reflects the venue and review process. — venue and review process.

Yogyakarta’s waste crisis is framed as structural and long-lasting

A red dump truck is parked beside a large pile of sorted waste and discarded materials on bare ground at what appears to be a landfill or waste collection area, with trees visible in the background.
Research area:Environmental planningSociology and Political ScienceEnvironmental sociology

What the study found

The article argues that Yogyakarta’s ‘garbage emergency,’ especially after the closure of the Piyungan landfill, reflects deeper structural conditions rather than only an immediate disposal problem. It describes the situation as shaped by hyperabjection, meaning the social and spatial pushing-away of waste and the people who manage it, and by slow violence, meaning harm that accumulates gradually over time.

Why the authors say this matters

The authors suggest waste should be understood as a socio-ecological crisis, not just a matter for techno-bureaucratic fixes. They conclude that the framing of waste as an emergency can help sustain neglect and disavowal of peripheral communities.

What the researchers tested

The article draws on the concept of the hyperobject, meaning something so large and diffuse it is hard to grasp as a single object, and its political reworking as the hyperabject. It uses the case of Yogyakarta’s waste problem, with attention to urban areas that externalize waste to suburban ‘sacrifice zones’ where informal workers manage untreated waste with minimal protection.

What worked and what didn't

The authors show that the ‘garbage emergency’ framing both comes from and reinforces structural conditions marked by neglect and disavowal. They also describe this as linked to socio-spatial inequality and environmental injustice affecting peripheral communities.

What to keep in mind

The abstract does not provide detailed methods beyond the conceptual framing and case focus. It also does not describe specific policy interventions, measurements, or comparative results.

Key points

  • The article links Yogyakarta’s waste crisis to socio-spatial inequality and environmental injustice.
  • It says the ‘garbage emergency’ framing both results from and perpetuates neglect and disavowal.
  • The study uses the ideas of hyperobject, hyperabject, and slow violence to interpret the case.
  • Urban areas are described as externalizing waste to suburban ‘sacrifice zones’ with informal workers and minimal protection.
  • The authors suggest waste should be treated as a socio-ecological crisis, not only a disposal issue.

Disclosure

Research title:
Yogyakarta’s waste crisis is framed as structural and long-lasting
Authors:
Rangga Kala Mahaswa, Min Seong Kim, Arya Malik Nurrizky
Institutions:
Universitas Gadjah Mada, University of Glasgow, Sanata Dharma University
Publication date:
2026-03-09
OpenAlex record:
View
AI provenance: This post was generated by OpenAI. The original authors did not write or review this post.