What the study found
The study found that a collaborative, co-developed programme for embedding a common mental health screening tool in district primary health care was broadly favoured. The authors conclude that scaling up this kind of screening innovation needs capacity building among mid-level management and a programme built on continuous quality improvement.
Why the authors say this matters
The authors suggest this matters because scaling up integrated primary mental healthcare in low- and middle-income settings is still not well described. They conclude that a collaborative approach may offer flexibility and shared problem-solving for more sustained implementation.
What the researchers tested
The researchers used participatory action research and a learning collaborative in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. The group included district mental health service coordinators, provincial managers and policymakers, and local researchers, and the programme was studied using workshop records, individual interviews, and a focus group discussion. The data were thematically analysed using the Consolidated Framework for Advancing Implementation Research.
What worked and what didn't
The participatory process led to consensus building, curriculum development, situational analyses, training, and continuous quality improvement. The collaborative approach was broadly favoured, and the programme was flexible enough to be adapted during COVID-19, including a shift to virtual workshops. Barriers included a lack of formal guidance for district mental health services, limited intersectoral collaboration, low community mental health literacy, under-prioritisation of mental health, lack of ring-fenced funding and data systems, and some primary care staff being less prepared or less willing to engage in mental healthcare. Face-to-face meetings were preferred over virtual ones.
What to keep in mind
The summary does not describe quantitative measures of effectiveness or long-term outcomes. The findings come from one province in South Africa and from the people involved in the programme, so the abstract does not claim broader generalisability.
Key points
- A co-developed collaborative programme was broadly favoured for embedding mental health screening in district primary health care.
- The process produced consensus building, curriculum development, training, and continuous quality improvement.
- Barriers included limited guidance, weak intersectoral collaboration, low mental health literacy, and under-prioritised district services.
- COVID-19 disruptions led to programme adaptations, including virtual workshops.
- The authors conclude that capacity building among mid-level management is important for scaling up.
Disclosure
- Research title:
- Collaborative scaling of mental health screening showed promise
- Authors:
- André Janse van Rensburg, Zamasomi Luvuno, Tasneem Kathree, Nikiwe Hongo, Londiwe Mthethwa, Merridy Grant, Arvin Bhana, Deepa P. Rao, Inge Petersen
- Institutions:
- Africa Health Research Institute, Center for Global Health, Curtin University, Edendale Hospital, South African Medical Research Council, Umkhuseli Innovation and Research Management, University of KwaZulu-Natal, University of KwaZulu-Natal, University of KwaZulu-Natal, University of KwaZulu-Natal, University of KwaZulu-Natal, University of KwaZulu-Natal
- Publication date:
- 2026-03-05
- OpenAlex record:
- View
Get the weekly research newsletter
Stay current with peer-reviewed research without reading academic papers — one filtered digest, every Friday.