AI Summary of Peer-Reviewed Research

This page presents an AI-generated summary of a published research paper. The original authors did not write or review this article. [See full disclosure ↓]

Publishing process signals: STRONG — reflects the venue and review process. — venue and review process.

Psychology journals varied in reporting participant characteristics

Decision Sciences research
Photo by KELLEPICS on Pixabay · Pixabay License
Research area:PsychologyPsychological researchStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty

What the study found

The study found an over-reliance on Western perspectives in participant samples across five areas of psychology. It also found substantial variation in how participant characteristics were reported across areas of psychology.

Why the authors say this matters

The authors say this matters because of the challenges of representation in psychology and the importance of interdisciplinary perspectives. They conclude that a unified reporting standard would help readers more readily assess how findings may generalise beyond the people actually sampled.

What the researchers tested

The researchers examined the Methods sections of five journals covering social, health, clinical, developmental, and general psychological science. The journals were published by the British Psychological Society between January 2021 and December 2023, covering 661 articles and 1,293 samples.

What worked and what didn't

Participants from Latin America, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Africa made up 8.7% of samples combined. Reporting of gender, race, socioeconomic status indicators, and education varied across psychology areas, and there were different norms for using students and crowd-sourcing platforms.

What to keep in mind

The abstract does not provide details on study limitations beyond the scope of the journals and time period examined. The summary available here is limited to the information reported in the title and abstract.

Key points

  • Five psychology journal areas were examined: social, health, clinical, developmental, and general psychological science.
  • Across the sample, participants from Latin America, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Africa accounted for 8.7% combined.
  • Reporting of participant gender, race, socioeconomic status, and education varied across psychology areas.
  • The study found different norms for using students and crowd-sourcing platforms.
  • The authors call for a unified standard of reporting participant samples.

Disclosure

Research title:
Psychology journals varied in reporting participant characteristics
Authors:
Leah Petrutiu, Megan E. Birney, R. Cooke, Simon John Stewart
Institutions:
Birmingham City University, University College Birmingham, University of Birmingham, University of Staffordshire, University of Staffordshire, University of Staffordshire
Publication date:
2026-01-28
OpenAlex record:
View
Image credit:
Photo by KELLEPICS on Pixabay · Pixabay License
AI provenance: This post was generated by gpt-5.4-mini (OpenAI). The original authors did not write or review this post.