Development of living evidence-informed guidelines, part 2

A group of healthcare professionals in white coats stand in a circle with their hands joined together at the center, viewed from below in an overhead composition.
Image Credit: Photo by rmealthcare on Pixabay (SourceLicense)

About This Article

This is an AI-generated summary of a research paper. The original authors did not write or review this article. See full disclosure ↓

The Journal of the American Dental Association·2026-03-01·View original paper →

Overview

This work addresses the implementation of structured, iterative topic prioritization approaches within living evidence-informed guidelines. The framework enables efficient resource allocation and systematic responsiveness to emerging evidence, ensuring guideline relevance across dynamic clinical and public health environments. Topic prioritization functions as a mechanism to align guideline scope with evolving evidence landscapes and stakeholder needs.

Methods and approach

A structured, iterative methodology for topic prioritization was developed to operationalize the living guidelines framework. The approach incorporates systematic processes for identifying priority topics, allocating resources according to evidence currency and clinical impact, and iteratively reassessing priorities as new evidence emerges. This cyclical process allows for continuous refinement of guideline scope and ensures alignment with current evidence bases and target user needs within rapidly evolving contexts.

Results

The structured prioritization approach successfully enables targeted resource allocation within living guidelines frameworks. The iterative methodology maintains responsiveness to emerging evidence while preserving organizational efficiency. By implementing systematic priority-setting processes, guideline producers can ensure that recommendations address topics most relevant to target users, with mechanisms for continuous reassessment and adaptation as evidence landscapes shift.

Implications

The framework provides guideline developers with operational mechanisms to maintain relevance and responsiveness without requiring comprehensive guideline overhauls. Structured topic prioritization supports sustainable living guidelines by directing resources toward topics with greatest evidence evolution and clinical significance. This approach facilitates access to current recommendations on priority topics for target users within resource-constrained environments.

Disclosure

  • Research title: Development of living evidence-informed guidelines, part 2
  • Authors: Ankita Shashikant Bhosale, Olivia R. Urquhart, Carolina Castro Martins-Pfeifer, Francisca Verdugo-Paiva, Michael Glick, Alonso Carrasco-Labra
  • Publication date: 2026-03-01
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2025.09.013
  • OpenAlex record: View
  • Image credit: Photo by rmealthcare on Pixabay (SourceLicense)
  • Disclosure: This post is an AI-generated summary of a research work. It was prepared by an editor. The original authors did not write or review this post.