AI Summary of Peer-Reviewed Research
This page presents an AI-generated summary of a published research paper. The original authors did not write or review this article. See full disclosure ↓
Publication Signals show what we were able to verify about where this research was published.STRONGWe verified multiple publication signals for this source, including independently confirmed credentials. Publication Signals reflect the source’s verifiable credentials, not the quality of the research.
- ✔ Peer-reviewed source
- ✔ Published in indexed journal
- ✔ No retraction or integrity flags
Key findings from this study
- The study found that genetically homogeneous dog populations were distributed across Europe and Anatolia by the Late Upper Palaeolithic, at least 14,300 years ago.
- The researchers demonstrate that dogs were exchanged among Magdalenian, Epigravettian, and Anatolian hunter-gatherer populations, indicating inter-group contact and trade networks.
- The authors report that eastern Eurasian dog ancestry entered European populations during the Mesolithic, concomitant with human population movements from eastern regions.
Overview
Nuclear and mitochondrial genomes from canid remains spanning 15,800 to 7,900 years ago demonstrate that genetically homogeneous dog populations were distributed widely across Europe and Anatolia by the Late Upper Palaeolithic. Genomic analysis of specimens from Türkiye, the UK, and Serbia establishes that dogs were exchanged among genetically and culturally distinct human populations during this period. Subsequent Mesolithic populations introduced eastern Eurasian dog ancestry into Europe through migration events.
Methods and approach
The researchers generated nuclear and mitochondrial genomes from canid remains at four archaeological sites: Pınarbaşı in Türkiye (15,800 years ago), Gough's Cave in the UK (14,300 years ago), Padina in Serbia (11,500-7,900 years ago), and Vlasac in Serbia (8,900 years ago). Genomic data enabled assessment of genetic homogeneity across geographic regions and temporal intervals. Ancestry analysis characterized the genetic composition of dog populations and tracked shifts in ancestry patterns between temporal periods.
Results
Dogs sampled from Türkiye, the UK, and Serbia possessed homogeneous genetic profiles by at least 14,300 years ago. This genetic consistency across geographically distant Late Upper Palaeolithic sites indicates substantial contact and animal exchange among Magdalenian, Epigravettian, and Anatolian hunter-gatherer populations. Eastern Eurasian dog ancestry increased substantially during the Mesolithic, coinciding with the northwestward movement of eastern hunter-gatherer populations. The influx of eastern ancestry fundamentally shaped the ancestral composition of subsequent European dog populations.
Implications
The genetic homogeneity of Late Upper Palaeolithic dogs across western Eurasia indicates that dog domestication and early selective breeding occurred within networks connecting distinct human societies. These findings demonstrate that dogs functioned as commodities or valued animals exchanged between cultural groups, suggesting dogs held significant cultural or practical importance during the Late Palaeolithic. The archaeological and genetic evidence together indicate that human social networks facilitated the rapid dispersal of domesticated dogs across Europe and Anatolia well before the Mesolithic period.
Scope and limitations
This summary is based on the study abstract and available metadata. It does not include a full analysis of the complete paper, supplementary materials, or underlying datasets unless explicitly stated. Findings should be interpreted in the context of the original publication.
Disclosure
- Research title: Dogs were widely distributed across western Eurasia during the Palaeolithic
- Authors: William A Marsh, Lachie Scarsbrook, Eren Yüncü, Lizzie Hodgson, Audrey T. Lin, Maria De Iorio, Olaf Thalmann, Mark G. Thomas, Mahaut Goor, Anders Bergström, Angela Noseda, Sarieh Amiri
- Institutions: American Museum of Natural History, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Middle East Technical University, National Museum of Natural History, National University of Singapore, Natural History Museum, Oxford Archaeology, Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Smithsonian Institution, University College London, University of East Anglia, University of York
- Publication date: 2026-03-25
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10170-x
- OpenAlex record: View
- Image credit: Photo by Azzedine Rouichi on Unsplash (Source • License)
- Disclosure: This post was generated by Claude (Anthropic). The original authors did not write or review this post.
Get the weekly research newsletter
Stay current with peer-reviewed research without reading academic papers — one filtered digest, every Friday.


