What the study found
Guideline recommendations developed with rigorous and transparent methods can provide trustworthy information for clinicians and other target users.
Why the authors say this matters
The study suggests these recommendations can support better decision making and improve patient outcomes.
What the researchers tested
The article describes the development of living evidence-informed guidelines, part 3. The abstract does not provide further details about the specific methods or study design.
What worked and what didn't
The abstract states that recommendations developed using the outlined methods were trustworthy information for target users. It does not describe any comparative results, failures, or outcomes beyond this claim.
What to keep in mind
The available summary does not describe limitations, sample size, setting, or specific guideline topics. No additional caveats are stated in the abstract.
Key points
- Rigorous and transparent guideline methods are described as producing trustworthy recommendations.
- The recommendations are said to support clinicians and other target users.
- The study suggests the recommendations can help with decision making and patient outcomes.
- The abstract does not give specific methods, results, or comparisons.
- No limitations are described in the available abstract.
Disclosure
- Research title:
- Living evidence-informed guidelines may support better decisions
- Authors:
- Olivia R. Urquhart, Francisca Verdugo-Paiva, Carolina Castro Martins-Pfeifer, Ankita Shashikant Bhosale, Michael Glick, Alonso Carrasco-Labra
- Institutions:
- University of Pennsylvania
- Publication date:
- 2026-03-01
- OpenAlex record:
- View
Get the weekly research newsletter
Stay current with peer-reviewed research without reading academic papers — one filtered digest, every Friday.


